SmartLink
Mining and minerals

Mining ERP in Pakistan: cost, timelines and site reporting

Mining ERP in Pakistan has to work where the connectivity does not, which is the single fact that separates it from every other sector on this site. SmartLink Services works from Karachi on shift production and grade capture, fleet availability, consumables planning and the cost per tonne that follows from all three. What follows is the commercial ground a general manager wants covered first: what published market rates put on this work, how long a rollout takes when the site is a day's travel away, and which production and contractor records the operation has to be able to produce. All figures are market ranges rather than our quotation.

Discuss your systems
Reported
Production and grade
Measured
Fleet availability
Costed
Per tonne moved
Sites
Often remote
Overview

Remote sites still need numbers the head office can trust

Mining operations generate a lot of data and often struggle to turn it into a timely picture. Production, grade, fleet hours and consumables all exist somewhere, usually in different systems and several spreadsheets, and by the time they are combined the shift they describe is long finished.

The valuable work is consolidation with discipline: one production figure, one grade reconciliation, one measure of fleet availability, and cost per tonne calculated from them consistently enough to compare month to month.

Remoteness shapes everything. Connectivity is intermittent, so capture has to work offline and sync later. Supply lead times are long, so consumables and critical spares planning matters more than it would elsewhere. Contractors do a large share of the work, so their hours, rates and compliance have to be handled properly rather than reconciled from invoices at month end.

The work

Where mining systems break

Drawn from the problems that come up repeatedly in this sector rather than from a generic capability list.

Where it usually hurts

  • Shift production reported too late to change anything
  • Grade reconciliation between plan, mined and delivered done by hand
  • Fleet availability and utilisation estimated rather than measured
  • Consumables and critical spares stocking out at long lead time
  • Contractor hours and rates reconciled from invoices at month end
  • Cost per tonne calculated differently by different people

What the work covers

  • Shift production and grade capture, working offline where connectivity fails
  • Fleet availability, utilisation and maintenance backlog reporting
  • Consumables, critical spares and long lead time procurement planning
  • Contractor hours, rates and compliance tracking
  • Cost per tonne modelling from consistent inputs
  • Consolidated site reporting into head office finance

Typically involves

ERP EAM and CMMS Mobile apps Offline sync
Discuss your systems
01

Why the shift report and the month end never agree

The gap between a shift report and a month end figure is almost never arithmetic. A supervisor reports what moved using truck counts against a nominal payload. Finance reports what was weighed, and survey reports what the volume says. All three are honest and all three measure something slightly different. Until a site decides which one is the production number and which ones are supporting measures, every operations meeting spends its first twenty minutes arguing about whose figure is correct instead of discussing what happened underground.

Timing does the rest of the damage. Assays come back from the lab days after the material moved. A downtime event gets recoded once the fitter has looked at it properly. A contractor confirms hours the following morning. So the shift figure is provisional by nature, and a system that treats a posted number as final forces people to correct it somewhere else, which in practice means a spreadsheet that then becomes the version everyone quotes.

Building for that reality is straightforward once it is accepted. The production record carries its own lineage: where the figure came from, when it was captured, when it was posted and which revision it is. Restatement becomes a normal operation with an audit trail rather than an embarrassment. Reports state the time they were produced, so a number quoted on Tuesday can be explained on Friday without anyone having to reconstruct what the data looked like at the time.

  • One agreed production figure per shift, with the supporting measures kept alongside it
  • Capture time and posting time recorded as separate fields
  • Restatement handled inside the system with a visible audit trail
  • Provisional and confirmed figures distinguished on the face of the report
  • Every report stamped with the as at time it was produced
02

Reconciling grade between plan, mined and delivered

Grade reconciliation is the check that tells you whether the resource model, the mine plan and the plant are describing the same orebody. The terminology is long established: ore loss, dilution, and a mine call factor comparing what the model said was there with what the plant actually received. What varies from site to site is the rigour behind the numbers. Where the reconciliation is rebuilt by hand each month, the workbook usually gets rebuilt too, and last year's basis quietly stops matching this year's.

Data ownership is the practical obstacle. Geology holds the block model, survey holds the volumes, dispatch holds the movements and the laboratory holds the assays. Each of them works to a different clock and a different level of confidence. Reconciliation only becomes repeatable when those four inputs are stored against a common period key and a common location hierarchy, so that a variance can be traced to a bench, a stockpile or a shift rather than argued about in general terms.

Stockpiles are where most reconciliation efforts quietly fail. Material rehandled through a stockpile loses its identity unless movements in and out are modelled explicitly, with an assumed grade that is itself reconciled over time. Netting stockpile movement off against production is the shortcut that makes the monthly figure balance and makes the annual figure meaningless. Modelling it costs a little more effort at capture, mostly in recording where material actually went rather than where the plan said it would go, and it saves an argument every quarter.

  • Model, mined and delivered tonnes and grade stored against the same period and location keys
  • Stockpile movements modelled explicitly instead of netted off against production
  • Assay results linked to the sample, the location and the shift that produced them
  • Ore loss, dilution and mine call factor calculated on the same basis every period
  • Variances routed to a named owner rather than left in a report footnote
03

Fleet availability measured from events rather than remembered

Most disputes about availability are disputes about definitions. Maintenance considers a unit available when it is mechanically fit to work. Operations considers it available when there is an operator, a face and somewhere to tip. Both positions are reasonable and they produce different numbers for the same asset on the same day, which is why the two departments can argue about a figure neither of them has calculated wrongly. Agreeing a single state model, and writing it down, does more for the credibility of fleet reporting than any dashboard.

The mechanism that makes it stick is simple and unforgiving. Every asset is in exactly one state at any moment, the states are mutually exclusive, and every minute of the shift is allocated to one of them. Breakdown, scheduled maintenance, standing without an operator, standing without work and operating are different things and have to be captured as different things. Delay codes need to be short enough that an operator can pick the right one at the end of a long shift, because a long list gets answered with whichever code is at the top.

Once the event stream exists, availability and utilisation both come out of it rather than being estimated separately, and the maintenance backlog can be read against the same asset register. That is also the point at which asset management discipline of the kind described in ISO 55001 stops being a document and starts being visible. The reporting itself is the easy part, and it is the part that gets the attention in a proposal. The real work is in the taxonomy, in the training that goes with it, and in the habit of using it consistently on every shift including the bad ones.

  • A single asset state model where every minute of the shift is allocated once
  • Breakdown, standing and scheduled maintenance separated at the point of capture
  • Delay codes kept short enough that they are used accurately
  • Availability and utilisation derived from the same event stream, not calculated apart
  • Maintenance backlog and defect history linked to the same asset register
01

What mining systems cost in Pakistan

Market pricing sorts into the same three bands as everywhere else, and mining sits at the top of them for structural reasons. A single location covering purchase, stores and accounting runs PKR 800,000 to 1,500,000 over two to three months, which describes a head office and not an operation. Five to seven modules with a mobile application sit at PKR 1,500,000 to 3,000,000 across three to four months. Work covering production capture, fleet, consumables and consolidation from site into head office starts at PKR 3,000,000 and runs four to six months or longer.

Multi location capability is quoted in the market at PKR 200,000 to 500,000 and it is the add on that mining always needs, because the operation and the office are separate worlds joined by a link that sometimes works. A mobile application at PKR 400,000 to 800,000 is equally unavoidable, since shift capture happens on a device in a pit rather than at a desk. Manufacturing and plant functionality sits at PKR 300,000 to 600,000 where the processing plant is in scope, and accounting and finance at PKR 200,000 to 400,000.

Offline capability is the line that separates a mining quotation from a generic one. Building capture that works with no signal, queues locally and reconciles without creating duplicates is a design problem rather than a setting, and it has to be tested by actually losing the connection mid shift rather than by reading a data sheet. Site count is the second driver, since consolidating three operations means three sets of delay codes, three interpretations of availability and one argument about which definition wins. Weighbridge and plant integration is the third. All of the above is market pricing. A real figure follows discovery, once site count, connectivity and the definitions used for availability and grade are agreed.

  • Offline capture designed and tested by losing the connection deliberately
  • Multi location capability quoted in the market at PKR 200,000 to 500,000
  • Mobile shift capture at PKR 400,000 to 800,000, not treated as optional
  • Delay codes and availability definitions reconciled across sites
  • Weighbridge and plant interfaces costed with their failure handling
02

How long a mining rollout takes

Reported timelines give three to six months for a mid sized rollout and nine to twelve for a large programme covering several sites. Mining operations usually sit in the upper half, and travel is the reason more often than technology.

Distance changes the rhythm of a project. A workshop that takes ninety minutes in Karachi becomes a two day commitment when the site is a flight and a drive away, so visits are batched, agendas are longer and the gaps between them are wider. Shift patterns compound it. Capture has to be proved on the night shift and at shift handover, which means somebody on the project team is there at three in the morning, and that is not a task to schedule on the final week before go live.

Weather and haul road condition close windows nobody controls. A rain season that makes the access road unreliable will move a training programme by weeks, and the plan should assume it rather than treat it as an exception. Assay turnaround adds a subtler delay: reconciling grade between plan, mined and delivered needs laboratory results that arrive days after the shift closed, so proving the reconciliation takes a full cycle rather than an afternoon. Definitions take the longest of all. Two superintendents will define availability differently, and until that is settled in writing, no report means anything.

  • Mid sized rollouts reported at three to six months, several sites nine to twelve
  • Site visits batched, because travel turns a workshop into a two day commitment
  • Capture proved on the night shift and at handover before go live
  • Access road and weather closures assumed in the plan rather than absorbed
  • Availability, delay and grade definitions signed before reporting is built
03

Production records, contractor control and reporting at a mine

Production reporting at a mine is a chain of measurements, and every link is somewhere the number can change. Shift tonnes recorded by a supervisor, weighbridge tickets at despatch, grade from a laboratory that reports two days later, and a head office figure assembled from all three. Where those live in separate places, the monthly reconciliation becomes an argument between people who each have a defensible number, and nobody can say which is right. Holding the chain in one system with the timing differences made explicit is what turns that argument into a variance report.

Whatever production and royalty returns your lease and your licence require, they are built from the same measurements. That is an argument for producing them from the system rather than from a spreadsheet somebody maintains, because a return that cannot be traced back to a weighbridge ticket is a return nobody can defend. What those returns must contain, and how they should be calculated, comes from your own advisers and the terms of your licence rather than from us.

Contractor control carries the same evidential weight. Hours claimed against hours recorded, rates against the agreed schedule, certification and induction current on the day the work happened. Capturing that while the work is being done, rather than reconstructing it from an invoice at month end, is the difference between a query settled in a morning and a dispute that runs a quarter.

On tax, section 3(9A) of the Sales Tax Act requires Tier-1 retailers and other notified persons to integrate with the FBR computerised system for real time reporting, and operations raising sales tax invoices meet the same requirement where notified. Our boundary is the same as everywhere: SmartLink implements and integrates. Classification, rates and the treatment of an unusual transaction are questions for your own tax adviser, and we configure to their written instruction.

  • Shift tonnes, weighbridge tickets and assay results held as one chain
  • Timing differences made explicit rather than netted away at month end
  • Production and royalty returns produced from the same underlying records
  • Contractor hours, rates and certification captured as the work happens
  • Licence obligations defined by your advisers, tax treatment by your tax adviser
How we deliver

Delivering in mining

Six steps, run on site rather than from Karachi where it matters. The emphasis shifts here: definitions are agreed before anything is configured, because sites that count differently cannot be compared afterwards.

  1. 01

    Discover

    Two days on site: the pit with dispatch and the shift boss, then the plant with metallurgy. We ask how tonnes and grade are recorded on a bad night, and what happens when the link drops.

  2. 02

    Blueprint

    Definitions come before design. The asset state model, the delay code list, the production figure of record and the basis for cost per tonne are written down and agreed by site and finance together.

  3. 03

    Build

    Capture is built offline first, then demonstrated with the link switched off. Shift entry, contractor timesheets and stockpile movements are configured with the supervisors who will use them at four in the morning.

  4. 04

    Test

    A full reporting cycle is run in parallel with whatever the site uses today. Where the two production figures disagree, we establish which one was right before anybody switches.

  5. 05

    Go live

    No part of cutover depends on the site being connected. Devices go live holding their own data, sync catches up when the link returns, and late assays update the shift record instead of breaking it.

  6. 06

    Run

    Support sits on site time rather than office hours, because the shifts that need help are the night ones. Handover names an owner for the delay codes, the equipment master and every measure definition.

Working together

Sequencing a mining rollout so the first month is not the pilot

Work of this kind goes wrong when analytics arrive before capture. The sensible order is to agree definitions, prove capture at a single site including the offline case, run the site in parallel with whatever it uses today for a full reporting cycle, and only then extend to the other operations. Parallel running is not wasted effort. It is the only honest way to find out which of the two numbers was right, and it is far cheaper than discovering the answer at year end.

Ownership has to transfer with the system. Master data for equipment, cost centres, activities and delay codes needs a custodian on site, and the definitions register needs someone who is allowed to say no to a change. Where that is not resolved during the project it does not resolve itself afterwards, and the consolidated reporting that looked solid at handover quietly loses its comparability over the following year.

Some things software will not fix, and it is better to say so early. Reporting does not improve fleet availability, it makes the losses visible and attributable. A reconciliation model cannot correct a sampling protocol that is not representative. Better capture will not compensate for a mine plan that was optimistic. What good systems do is remove the excuse that nobody knew, which is usually enough to change what happens on the next shift.

Credentials

Compliance for mining clients

Mining groups ask what we are accredited on, and almost always ask separately how the site medical records will be handled.

Oracle

Partner

Oracle Database sits behind a lot of consolidated site reporting, and it is usually where the performance work lands once several years of shift and fleet event data have accumulated.

Microsoft

Partner

SQL Server and Power BI do most of the work, with offline capable apps syncing into them. Azure gives a remote site somewhere to send data that is not a server in a portacabin.

Google

Partner

Modest relevance on a mine. Workspace and Android device management are useful for the tablets that go underground and get replaced often, and for reporting head office reads on the move.

FBR digital invoicing

Compliant integrations

Concentrate and mineral sales invoices fall under the same digital invoicing obligation as everything else. We integrate the sales side to the Federal Board of Revenue system and keep the royalty workings alongside it.

HIPAA

Compliant practices

Relevant only at the medical centre. Pre employment and periodic medicals, fitness records and clinic notes are held with access limited by role and audit logging, under a business associate agreement where one applies.

Client words

What mining clients say

Comments from people running mining systems day to day.

  • Our first concern with FBR integration was simple: what happens to the tills when the line drops. They built the queueing and retry before anything else and demonstrated it by pulling the connection in front of us. Trading carried on, and the invoices went up when the link came back.
    Operations Manager Retail chain, Pakistan
  • Every vendor we spoke to said they could handle style, colour and size. This team asked to see our order book first, then told us which of the shortlisted platforms would need thousands of item codes to do it. That one piece of advice probably saved us a year.
    General Manager Textile exporter
  • The handover was the part I judged them on. Configuration decisions documented with the reasoning, our administrators trained properly, and a checklist we actually worked through. We run it ourselves now, and calling them is a choice rather than a necessity.
    Head of Shared Services Multi site manufacturing group
Questions

Questions about mining systems

Published market pricing puts production capture, fleet, consumables and site consolidation at PKR 3,000,000 upwards, with a narrower scope of five to seven modules at PKR 1,500,000 to 3,000,000. Multi location capability is quoted at PKR 200,000 to 500,000 and mobile capture at PKR 400,000 to 800,000. Those are market ranges rather than our price, and our figure follows discovery once site count and connectivity are known.

Reported timelines give three to six months for a mid sized rollout and nine to twelve for several sites. Mining sits in the upper half, largely because of travel: a workshop that takes ninety minutes in Karachi becomes a two day commitment at site. Capture also has to be proved on the night shift before anyone signs.

No, but it changes the design. Capture works offline, queues locally and reconciles without creating duplicates when the link returns, and we test that by dropping the connection mid shift rather than by reading a data sheet. What we will not do is promise live head office dashboards from a site that has four hours of signal a day.

Yes, once the definitions agree. Consolidation is straightforward engineering; the hard part is that two superintendents define availability differently and both have been right for years. We get delay codes, availability and grade definitions signed before any consolidated report is built, because otherwise the consolidated report simply moves the same argument upstairs to people with less context.

The system produces them from the same weighbridge tickets, shift records and assay results that everything else uses, which means a figure can be traced back rather than defended from memory. What the returns must contain, and how they are calculated, comes from your own advisers and the terms of your licence rather than from us.

It is design effort rather than a licence line, and it is concentrated in the queueing, conflict handling and reconciliation rather than in the screens. The honest answer is that it varies with how long a site can be disconnected and how many people capture at once. We price it after seeing the site rather than from a coverage map.

Other sectors

The other sectors we work in.

The same practices, applied to the problems each sector actually has.

01 Governmental Departments and authorities that need auditable systems, controlled access and procurement that survives scrutiny. 02 Food Manufacturing Batch traceability, shelf life and yield, joined up from goods in through to the despatch note. 03 Aluminum Alloy, coil and billet traceability with the costing detail that melting, extrusion and finishing actually need. 04 Retail Tills, stock and online joined to one set of numbers, with FBR digital invoicing where it applies. 05 Professional services Time, utilisation and project profitability made visible while a job can still be steered. 06 Wholesale Distribution Stock accuracy, route delivery and true landed cost across warehouses and vans. 07 Oil & Gas Asset heavy operations where maintenance, permits and contractor control carry real consequence. 08 Construction Project cost control, subcontractor certification and valuations that reconcile to the ledger. 09 Automotive Part traceability, supplier schedules and dealer systems joined to the plant. 10 Telecom High volume billing, provisioning and network asset data, joined without breaking the month end. 11 Textile Style, colour and size matrices, plus real costing across spinning, weaving, dyeing and stitching.
All industries

Working with mining systems?

Tell us what you run today and where it breaks. The first conversation is a consultation, not a pitch.

Book a consultation All industries